Welcome to Raggedy Ann Girl in a 'Barbie Doll' World!

Oftentimes the world can seem too harsh. It can be too flash, too fast, too bewildering. It can be loud, unfriendly and so, so negative. We need to step away from the masses, to take time out for ourselves. BE ourselves. Without worrying about what everyone else thinks. We need a fresh start, a new approach. And most of all we need a sense of humour.
So, let's start right now. Let's shed our artificial 'Barbie doll' skins and embrace our inner Raggedy Anns!

About the blogger

United Kingdom
Derby-born Nicola Rippon is a freelance writer. She has been a regular contibutor to the "Derby Telegraph" and "Derbyshire Life & Countryside". She is the author of a number of books of both local and national interest, including "Derby Our City (2001) and "Derbyshire's Own" (2006); and is the co-author of "Goodey's Derby" (2003). In 2001 she wrote and co-produced the highly-acclaimed film "Derby: A People's History".Educated in Derbyshire at Dale Primary and Littleover Schools, she is a long-suffering Rams season ticket holder. Her latest book "The Plot to Kill Lloyd George: The Story of Alice Wheeldon and the Peartree Conspiracy" was published in 2009 and she is still ridiculously excited that she can search for herself on Amazon! With a number of exciting projects 'in the pipeline', two cats to follow around and a vegetable patch to tend, Nicola is grateful for this opportunity to vent and muse on this blog.

22 March 2010

Ephiphany, liberty, modernity?

"It" happened a couple of days ago. I reached the point where I wondered whatever had gone wrong with the world. I usually kid myself I'm way too young for such pessimistic musings, but sitting on a bus, surrounded by argument and aggression, I finally reached the point where I admitted that some days I'm not too fond of modern society. Please don't misunderstand: I'm naturally liberal-minded, don't expect the world to play like a Disney film, and I'm certainly not one of those straight-arrow sorts who are absolute in their confidence that their personal mark of comfort marks precisely the level of censorship to which we should all adhere. I have little problem with cursing, have been known to throw a fair few around myself, I can happily watch films containing what the British Board of Film Classification call 'strong language' or 'violence' when it's relevant to the story. Although, on the subject of these classifications, I've often wondered whether they actually do more harm than good. The tv companies now seem to show warnings before almost any broadcast. 'This programme contains adult themes' and 'moderate sex' are among their favourites. Although quite what the latter means, I'm yet to establish.
But what I really don't understand is the nannying of a society that tells us , before a showing of the classic family tale 'The Railway Children' - certificate U, by the way - that it 'contains scenes of characters in danger', yet appears to have a laissez-faire attitude to the behaviour of real people. While I was sitting on a bus on the way to town I certainly began to wish that we had a censorship board for every day life. At the front a couple of surly teenagers discussed, using what those censors would no doubt call 'mild language' the anticipated fate of their friend, whose court hearing for some alcohol-fuelled misdemeanour was later that day. A few rows behind them a young couple argued. As her boyfriend casually stroked her thigh, the girl loudly chided him for some insult he'd hurled at her in earshot of his friends. Although the girl's apparent reticence did not prevent her from broadcasting their argument to 30-odd assorted passengers and the scene containing "strong language and scenes of a sexual nature' continued unabated.
But the most alarming little scene was playing out behind me. On the back seat of the bus two young men - one a scruffy looking man wearing an overcoat that should long ago have been taken for dry-cleaning, if not thrown out entirely, the other an overly-neat lad, with close-cropped hair and wearing far too much aftershave were barking insults at one another. What had started out as a debate over the second lad mistakenly sitting on the corner of the coat of the first, had quickly first degenerated into accusations of ill-intent, speedily evolved towards mutual nasty threats and was, any moment now I was certain, edging towards 'scenes of bloody violence'. As I looked around for an escape route and wondered whether either might be concealing a knife, the pair suddenly quietened down. I wasn't sure whether this was good or bad. After all either might, even then, have been preparing to silence their tormentor. As it happened the story came to a quick denouement as the bus reached its destination, and most of the passengers disgorged none the wiser to the Quentin Tarantinoesque scene that had occurred. Even the warring lovers now seemed content to indulge in only 'mild slapstick violence' as they batted each other playfully, and I watched as the two young men strode off in reassuringly disparate directions.
But as I stood there I had an epiphany. Just when did it become so commonplace for ordinary, everyday arguments to escalate into acts of such terrible violence that I would fear for my own safety on a bus ride from a peaceful suburb to the town centre? When did couples decide it was appropriate to discuss the ups and downs of their relationship within earshot of strangers? And when did it become a boast, rather than a moment of shame, for teenagers to reveal their drunken misbehaviour?
. Some people claim that what people are exposed to on tv and on DVDs is responsible, but I don't buy that.. Most of us know what it right and wrong, what's acceptable and what's not or at least we did when we were kids. Just because we sometimes see a different set of rules on a small screen in the corner of our sitting room doesn't change that. And if tv and films are so influencial, why is it only the negative behaviours that we take on?
Blaming tv simply absolves people of responsibility for their own behaviour. And I don't necessarily blame 'the parents' either. There are plenty of adults of all ages, some born and raised well before the age of so-called liberalism, who are every bit as guilty as the young.
I don't have an answer. I wish I did. I wish someone did because I fear that, unless we have a huge shift in thinking, or more of us dare to take a stand, before long there'll be nothing left to preserve. And all the censorship in the world won't matter one jot.

29 January 2010

PLEASE HELP ENGLISH CHRONIC ILLNESS SUFFERERS!

In 2008 Prime Minister Gordon Brown made a promise at his party conference to grant free prescriptions to all those in England with chronic, long-term and serious conditions.(those in Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales either already get this, or are about to) Time is now running out to getting this into and through Parliament before the next General Election (likely to be in May or June). After this point it is likely to go right to the bottom of the list of priorities, if not be abandoned altogether. 20 charities are joining together, focussing on Monday 1st February 2010, to make the Government come through on their promise. The economic downturn is no excuse not to follow through on this promise, since the recession has made it even more costly for chronically ill people to pay for their medication. Many are forced to take risks with their welfare by not getting their medication rather than see their families struggling to cope financially.We all know how important our regular medication is!
For Asthma UK's take on this please go to: http://blog.asthma.org.uk/30_seconds_with_gord.html
and for Mind.org's go to: www.mind.org.uk/news/2735_charities_call_for_gordon_brown_to_keep_his_prescription_promise

You can help! You can sign a petition at http://www.prescriptionpromise.org/ where you can also email your local MP and see a list of the charities involved, and you can utilise social networks like Facebook & Twitter to get the word out.
Please use everything you can think of to get the word out - the Government would like the promise to be forgotten, but it's our job (and to our benefit) to make sure it is not.
Thanks!

16 December 2009

To the thief who tried to take my money ...

Dear Thief
You know who you are, even though you probably do this so often you won't even remember my name. Well, let me remind you. I am the British tourist whose credit card you cloned when I paid in a restaurant in Berlin last week and used it in Russia to buy from an Italian website. I don't know whether you are the cheerful and friendly waitress (who I tipped generously for your excellent service), or whether you are another member of staff. Perhaps you are the owner of the establishment that boasted it had been in situ for 100 years. Perhaps you have no connection with that restaurant aside from having the opportunity to place something inside the card reader to copy my information (as my credit card company informs me you operate). Whatever, whoever you are you may have managed to inconvenience my entire family, who now have no credit cards for up to ten days. You may have forced us to rethink our activities in the lead-up to Christmas. You may have stopped me purchasing a limited-edition item I had been waiting weeks to buy. You have almost certainly landed us with the embarrassment of having to field calls from people who find that our payments have been refused. But you will not get our money. You may find that you do not even get your fraudulently-acquired goods because our credit card company spotted it very quickly.
You're probably wondering why I'm even bothering to write this. The simple answer is it makes me feel better. When I go to bed tonight, it'll calm me to know I've had my say, and I'll sleep well. I wonder how well you sleep at night?

Followers